![]() ![]() Siemens asserted that the ARF logs would be enough for an ISP - in this case, Telstra - to “be able to identify the alleged infringer of the asserted software.” “If the IP address resolves to an ISP, then the alleged infringer is. “If a static IP address has been assigned to a specific entity, rather than an internet service provider (ISP), then a search of the publicly available register of IP addresses will resolve to a particular entity that is likely to be the alleged infringer,” the judgment states, citing evidence provided by Siemens. ![]() Siemens said that while sometimes the data in an ARF report “is sufficient to identify the person responsible for cracking the software, … on other occasions, the details are insufficient, and only a general company or email domain is given (such as “”, or “”) and the only unique identifier captured within the report is an IP address.” ![]() “The cracking allows the infringer to have full access to all of the modules of the asserted software without having paid to licence them.” “The primary method of copyright infringement about which Siemens is concerned is where the alleged infringer uses versions of the asserted software that have been ‘cracked’ or tampered with by a person or (more likely) a company who is licensed to use some, but not all of the asserted software. “The ARF is capable of identifying the computer on which unlicensed copies of the asserted software are used by collecting data related to the source of that use, when that computer is connected to the internet. It cannot be removed or ‘switched off’ from the asserted software,” the judgment states. “ embedded in each of the asserted software products. ![]() Siemens said it had identified IP addresses associated with the alleged use of cracked versions of its software through a feature in the software called the automatic reporting function or ARF. “Representative bundles” of the licensing costs for the software and a year of maintenance ranged from $88,440.47 to $337,514.45. The software maker’s interest is with its NX and Solid Edge products, which are both used for computer-aided design, and form part of a broader PLM suite. “Siemens contends that it may have a right to obtain relief against 20 prospective respondents for infringement of copyright in certain computer software that it owns,” the judgment states. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |